|  
        NIDA's research into treatments for cocaine abuse has identified a variety 
        of effective treatments ranging from group drug counseling to individualized 
        psychotherapies. In a NIDA-funded clinical trial investigating the efficacy 
        of four types of treatment, patients who received group drug counseling 
        combined with individual drug counseling were more likely to reduce their 
        drug use than were patients who received group drug counseling alone or 
        in combination with psychotherapies that are used to treat addictions. 
        Patients who received combined individual and group drug counseling used 
        less cocaine than did patients who received other forms of treatment. 
        The NIDA Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study involved 487 patients with 
        relatively low levels of psychiatric severity whose principal diagnosis 
        was cocaine dependence as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 
        of Mental Disorders. The drug counseling therapies evaluated in the multisite 
        study are specifically designed to treat drug use; the psychotherapies-supportive-expressive 
        therapy and cognitive therapy-are less focused on drug use. The study 
        involved patients recruited at five sites-the University of Pennsylvania 
        in Philadelphia; the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic at the University 
        of Pittsburgh; Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston; McLean Hospital 
        in Belmont, Massachusetts; and Brookside Hospital in Nashua, New Hampshire. 
        Each research center provided four treatments: group drug counseling alone, 
        group drug counseling combined with individual drug counseling, group 
        drug counseling combined with cognitive therapy, or group drug counseling 
        combined with supportive-expressive therapy. Each of the 487 patients 
        was randomly assigned to one of the therapies. Treatment results were 
        evaluated through patient self-reporting, weekly observed urine testing, 
        and the Addiction Severity Index-an interview-based assessment used to 
        measure treatment outcome. During each of the 6 months of treatment, and 
        at 3 months and 6 months after treatment ended, patients who received 
        combined individual and group drug counseling used less cocaine and drugs 
        overall than did patients who received other forms of treatment. A higher 
        percentage of combined drug counseling patients were able to achieve abstinences 
        of 1, 2, and 3 months than were patients in the other study groups. During 
        the 6 months after treatment ended, 38 percent of patients who completed 
        combined counseling treatment maintained drug-free periods of 3 consecutive 
        months compared with 27 percent of patients treated with group counseling 
        alone, 23 percent of patients treated with cognitive therapy plus group 
        counseling, and 18 percent of patients receiving supportive-expressive 
        therapy plus group counseling. In addition, patients who received combined 
        drug counseling showed more improvement in Addiction Severity Index ratings 
        than did patients receiving other treatments. "These results underline 
        the valuable role of well-designed drug counseling in treating drug abuse. 
        More specifically, this study demonstrates the effectiveness that combined 
        counseling therapies can have in treating cocaine addiction," notes Dr. 
        Jack Blaine of NIDA's Division of Treatment Research and Development. 
        "The success of combined drug counseling treatment compared with the psychotherapies 
        may be due to the fact that drug counseling delivers a message that is 
        simple and strong-stay away from the situations where you use drugs and 
        the people you use drugs with. The counselors at all sites involved in 
        our study were able to deliver that message effectively," says Dr. Paul 
        Crits-Christoph of the University of Pennsylvania, who coordinated the 
        multicenter study. Criteria for Success "The success of combined drug 
        counseling compared with other treatments is the result of the nature, 
        intensity, and quality of counseling," Dr. Crits-Christoph says. "We paid 
        a great deal of attention to selecting and training counselors, all of 
        whom had extensive previous experience treating patients with substance 
        abuse disorders." The counselors and psychotherapists received more than 
        a year of training in standardized therapy using published manuals, and 
        were evaluated during training and certified prior to participation in 
        the collaborative treatment study. Group drug counseling, given to all 
        study participants, consisted of weekly sessions for the full 6 months 
        of the study and individual meetings with the group counselor once per 
        month during a 3-month "booster" phase following the 6 months of active 
        treatment. Patients in individual drug counseling and psychotherapy treatments 
        participated in twice-weekly sessions during the first 3 months, weekly 
        sessions during the second 3 months, and monthly meetings during the booster 
        phase. Group drug counseling treatment involved an initial 3-month phase 
        during which patients were educated about the concepts in recovery from 
        addiction, and a second 3-month phase that involved open group discussions 
        focusing on patients helping each other solve problems encountered in 
        recovery. Individual drug counseling focused on helping patients achieve 
        and maintain abstinence through behavioral changes such as avoiding situations 
        that trigger drug use. Group drug counseling and individual drug counseling 
        encouraged patient involvement in self-help and support groups such as 
        Cocaine Anonymous outside of scheduled treatment sessions. Cognitive therapy 
        involved identifying the underlying beliefs related to a patient's drug 
        use. Therapists worked with patients to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages 
        of their beliefs. They also employed role-playing, behavioral experiments, 
        and scheduling and monitoring activities. Supportive-expressive therapy 
        involved identifying interpersonal conflicts that relate to a patient's 
        drug use. Therapists helped patients interpret the role that these conflicts 
        play in drug use and problems encountered in stopping drug use. Because 
        treatment and training were based on published manuals, it may be possible 
        for other treatment programs to achieve similar results, Dr. Crits-Christoph 
        notes. "If other programs can apply these tools with the intensity that 
        characterized this study, their outcomes should be similarly successful." 
        Sources Crits-Christoph, P., et al. The National Institute on Drug Abuse 
        collaborative cocaine treatment study: Rationale and methods. Archives 
        of General Psychiatry 54(8):721-726, 1997. Crits-Christoph, P., et al. 
        Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: Results of the National 
        Institute on Drug Abuse collaborative cocaine treatment study. Archives 
        of General Psychiatry 56(6):493-502, 1999. Crits-Christoph, P., et al. 
        Training in cognitive, supportive-expressive, and drug counseling therapies 
        for cocaine dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 
        66(3):484- 492, 1998.  
       |